Comparative analysis of the properties of traditional vs 3D printed mortar for building construction

Authors

  • Alireza Amirfiroozkoohi ETSEM, Polytechnic University of Madrid
  • Tomás Gil-López Department of Building Technology. Higher Technical School of Building – ETSEM, Polytechnic University of Madrid https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3819-8756
  • Mercedes Valiente-López Department of Building Technology. Higher Technical School of Building – ETSEM, Polytechnic University of Madrid https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8643-7921

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20868/ade.2025.5638

Keywords:

3D printing, Additive manufacturing, Water-cement, Water-cement ratio, Rheology, Ultrasonic pulse testing, Bonding of layers

Abstract

Mortar 3D printing has emerged as a disruptive technology in construction, offering advantages in geometric design, sustainability and production efficiency. The life cycle analysis (LCA) shows a 35% reduction in carbon footprint compared to traditional methods, positioning this technology as a viable alternative for sustainable construction. This study delves into the comparative analysis through non-destructive testing of 3D printed mortars versus traditional methods. The results show that the printing orientation significantly influences the ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), with lower values in the X direction due to the presence of interlayer voids. In contrast, the traditional mortar exhibited more homogeneous UPV, reflecting a consolidated microstructure. Ultrasonic attenuation analysis revealed a direct correlation between porosity and wave scattering, confirming that 3D printing technology introduces mechanical anisotropy. These findings underscore the need to optimize extrusion parameters and geometric design to ensure durability in structural applications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ali, A., Riaz, R. D., Malik, U. J., Abbas, S. B., Usman, M., Shah, M. U., Kim, I.-H., Hanif, A., & Faizan, M. (2023). Machine learning-based predictive model for tensile and flexural strength of 3D-printed concrete. Materials, 16(11), 4149.

2. Amirfiroozkoohi, A, Gil-Lopez, T, Valiente-Lopez, M. (2025). Evolution of 3D mortar printing applied to architecture and construction. Real case study. In Graphic Thinking. Proceedings of the XVII International Conference on Graphic Expression Applied to Building – APEGA Cartagena 2025 (pp. 786–797). Cartagena. ISBN 978-84-95781-52-9.

3. Allameh S. (2015). The Development of a 3D Printer for Combinatorial Structural Composite Research, ASME 2015 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection.

4. All3DP (2021). 8 Biggest Companies Building 3D Printed Houses, https://all3dp.com/2/2019-best-companies-building-3d-printed-houses/

5. Almazán, C. (2018). La arquitectura de la impresión 3D. La influencia Vóxel. Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura de Madrid. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.

6. Baduge, S.K., Navaratnam, S., Abu-Zidan, Y., McCormack, T., Nguyen, K., Mendis, P., Zhang, G., Aye, L. (2021). Improving performance of additive manufactured (3D printed) concrete: A review on material mix design, processing, interlayer bonding, and reinforcing methods.

7. Bae, CJ., Diggs, AB., Ramachandran, A. (2018). Quantification and certification of additive manufacturing materials and processes, Korea Institute of Materials (KIMS), Changwon, South Korea; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

8. Ball, J. (2019). Meet the builder behind the world’s first 3D printed bridge in Spain, https://www.constructionweekonline.com/projects-tenders/168913-meet-the-builder-behind-the-worlds-first-3d-printed-bridge-in-spain.

9. Bos, F., Wolfs, R., Ahmed, Z., Salet, T. (2019). Additive manufacturing of concrete in construction: potentials and challenges of 3D concrete printing.

10. Chang-Jun Bae, Alisha B. Diggs, Arathi Ramachandran (2018). Quantification and certification of additive manufacturing materials and processes, Korea Institute of Materials (KIMS), Changwon, South Korea; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

11. Cline, L. S. (2016). 3D Printing and CNC Fabrication with SketchUp, McGraw Hill Education.

12. Farina I, Fabbrocino F, Carpentieri G, Modano M, Amendola A, Goodall R, et al. (2016). On the reinforcement of cement mortars through 3D printed polymeric and metallic fibers. Compos B Eng.

13. Gil-Lopez, T, Amirfiroozkoohi, A, Valiente-Lopez, M, Verdu-Vazquez, A. (2026). The Impact of 3D Printing on Mortar Strength and Flexibility: A Comparative Analysis of Conventional and Additive Manufacturing Techniques. Materials. In press.

14. Greguric, L. (2018). "History of 3D Printing – When Was 3D Printing Invented," All3DP, all3dp.com/2/history-of-3d-printing-when-was-3d-printing-invented/.

15. Heras Murcia, D., Genedy, M., & Reda Taha, M. M. (2020). Examining the significance of infill printing pattern on the anisotropy of 3D printed concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 262, 120559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120559.

16. Hui-Cai, X., Geng-ying, L. & Guang-jing, X. (2022). Microstructure model of the interfacial zone between fresh and old concrete. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol.-Mat. Sci. Edit. 17, 64–68 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02838421.

17. Lu B, Weng Y, Li M, Qian Ye, Leong KF, Tan MJ, Qian S. (2019). A systematical review of 3D printable cementitious materials. Constr Build Mater.

18. Luan CC, Yao XH, Zhang C, Wang B, Fu JZ. (2019). Large-scale deformation and damage detection of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced polymer-matrix composite structures. Compos Struct.

19. Ma, G.W., Wang, L., Ju, Y. (2018). State-of-the-art 3D printing technology of cementitious material-an emerging technique for construction. Sci China-Technol Sci.

20. Michael Molitch-Hou. (2018). Overview of additive manufacturing process, ENGINEERING.com, Mississauga, ON, Canada.

21. Mo Y, Yue S, Zhou Q, Feng B, Liu X. (2021). Dynamic Properties and Fractal Characteristics of 3D Printed Cement Mortar in SHPB Test. Materials (Basel). Sep 24;14(19):5554. doi: 10.3390/ma14195554.

22. Molitch-Hou, M. (2018). Overview of additive manufacturing process, ENGINEERING.com, Mississauga, ON, Canada.

23. Salgado Correa, E.C. (2023). Análisis de sostenibilidad de mezclas para impresión 3D. Trabajo Fin de Máster. Escuela de Caminos. Universidad Politécnica de Barcelona.

24. Sánchez Izquierdo, F. (2022). Mortero impreso en 3D. Trabajo Fin de Grado. Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.

25. Sanjayan, J. G., Jayathilakage, R., & Rajeev, P. (2021). Vibration induced active rheology control for 3D concrete printing. Cement and Concrete Research, 140, 106293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106293.

26. Sanjayan, J.G and Nematollahi, B. (2019). 3D Concrete Printing for Construction Applications. Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria, Australia.

27. Types of 3D printers, https://www.impresoras3d.com/tipos-de-impresoras-3d, POSTED ON MAY 1, 2017 BY PRINTERS3D.COM.

28. Vantyghem, G., Boel, V., Steeman, M., De Corte, W. (2019). Multi-material topology optimization involving simultaneous structural and thermal analyses, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim.

29. Xiangcheng, M. and Xueqing Z. (2019). Case Study Analysis for Development Strategies of Construction 3D Printing, Washington

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Amirfiroozkoohi, A., Gil-López, T., & Valiente-López, M. (2025). Comparative analysis of the properties of traditional vs 3D printed mortar for building construction. Anales De Edificación, 11(3), 17-22. https://doi.org/10.20868/ade.2025.5638

Most read articles by the same author(s)