Evaluating the impact of input variables on thermal load estimation in office spaces using validated models

Authors

  • Silvia Soutullo Energy Efficiency in Buildings R&D Unit, CIEMAT
  • Emanuela Giancola Energy Efficiency in Buildings R&D Unit, CIEMAT
  • María Nuría Sánchez Energy Efficiency in Buildings R&D Unit, CIEMAT
  • Beatriz Porcar Energy Efficiency in Buildings R&D Unit, CIEMAT
  • María José Jiménez Plataforma Solar de Almería-CIEMAT

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20868/ade.2024.5494

Keywords:

validated models, performance-gap, influential variables, uncertainties, sensitivity analysis

Abstract

The design and optimisation of energy efficiency measures in buildings are often based on simulation models, which must be validated with experimental measurements to ensure a reliable representation of the building’s actual behaviour. One of the main challenges in this process is minimizing uncertainties associated with input variables, as any deviation can lead to significant discrepancies from the design case. The main objective of this study is to quantify the impact of input variable variations on the heating and cooling loads of an office model. For this purpose, a validated dynamic simulation methodology has been developed and implemented in several phases: monitoring of the office space and boundary conditions; dynamic modelling of the office; validation of the simulation model using experimental data; and sensitivity study through parametric and influence analysis. As a result of this methodology, the most influential variables affecting three annual series of thermal demand have been identified. In this case study, it is concluded that accurate definition of seasonal set-point temperatures, climate files, and infiltration rates are crucial for obtaining accurate thermal demand estimates. Conversely, variations in occupancy schedules and ground temperature profiles have a lower impact, allowing for less accuracy in their input definition without compromising the reliability of the results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ascione, F., De Masi, R.F., Festa, V., Gigante, A., Ruggiero, S., & Vanoli, G.P. (2022) Thermal and energy performance of a nearly zero-energy building in Mediterranean climate: the gap between designed and monitored loads of space heating and cooling systems. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 44(1), 732–747. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2022.2050852.

2. ASHRAE. (2014). ASHRAE Guideline 14-2014. Measurement of Energy, Demand, and Water Savings. ASHRAE. ISSN 1049-894X.

3. CTE (2006). Código técnico de la Edificación. B.O.E. 2 agosto 2006. https://www.codigotecnico.org/ (accessed 18 April 2024)

4. Díaz-Hernández, H.P., Sánchez, M.N., Olmedo, R., Villar-Ramos, M.M., Macias-Melo, E.V., Aguilar-Castro, K.M., & Jiménez, M.J. (2021). Performance assessment of different measured variables from onboard monitoring system to obtain the occupancy patterns of rooms in an office building. Journal of Building Engineering 40, 102676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102676

5. GenOpt. (s.f.). Generic Optimization program GenOpt website. https://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/GO/ (accessed 18 April 2024)

6. In-Situ-BEPAMAS. (2020). Proyecto In-Situ-BEPAMAS. Building Energy Performance Assessment based on In-Situ Measurement, Analysis and Simulation. http://projects.ciemat.es/web/in-situ-bepamas/ (accessed 18 April 2024)

7. Jiménez, M.J., Díaz, J.A., Alonso, A.J., Castaño, S., & Pérez, M. (2021). Non-Intrusive Measurements to Incorporate the Air Renovations in Dynamic Models Assessing the In-Situ Thermal Performance of Buildings. Energies 2021, 14(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14010037

8. Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B., & Rubel, F. (2006) World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 15, 259-263. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130.

9. Lapuente, C. S., Soutullo, S., Sánchez, M. N., Giancola, E., & Jiménez, M.J. (2023). Efecto de las hipótesis habituales y medidas reales sobre la temperatura del terreno en la evaluación del comportamiento energético de edificios en uso. Caso de estudio en Almería. Congreso Internacional CITE, Madrid, España.

10. Olmedo, R., Sánchez, M.N., Enríquez, R., Jiménez, M.J., & Heras, M.R. (2016). ARFRISOL Buildings-UIE3-CIEMAT. In A. Janssens (Eds.), IEA, EBC Annex 58, Report of Subtask 1a. Inventory of full scale test facilities for evaluation of building energy performances. ISBN: 9789460189906, Published by KU Leuven, Belgium.

11. Patrick, X.W. Z., Dipika, W., & Morshed, A. (2019). Strategies for minimizing building energy performance gaps between the design intend and the reality. Energy and Buildings 191, 31-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.03.013.

12. Porcar, B., Soutullo, S., Enríquez, R., & Jiménez, M.J. (2018). Quantification of the uncertainties produced in the construction process of a building through simulation tools: A case study. Journal of Building Engineering 20, 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.08.008.

13. Sánchez, M.N., Soutullo, S., Olmedo, R., Bravo, D., Castaño, S., & Jiménez, M.J. (2020). An experimental methodology to assess the climate impact on the energy performance of buildings: A ten-year evaluation in temperate and cold desert areas. Applied Energy 264, 114730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114730

14. Soutullo, S., Sánchez, M.N., Enríquez, R., Jimenez, M.J., Heras, M.R. (2017). Empirical estimation of the climatic representativeness in two different areas: dessert and Mediterranean climates. Energy Procedia 122, 829-834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.415

15. Soutullo, S., Giancola, E., & Heras, M.R. (2018). Dynamic energy assessment to analyse different refurbishment strategies of existing dwellings placed in Madrid. Energy 152, 1011–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.017.

16. Soutullo, S., Suárez, M.J., García, D., & Blanco, E. (2019). Decision matrix methodology for retrofitting techniques of existing buildings. Journal of Cleaner Production 240, 118153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118153.

17. Tian, W., Heo, Y., de Wilde, P., Li, Z., Yan, D., Park, C.S., Feng, X., & Augenbroe, W. (2018). A review of uncertainty analysis in building energy assessment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 93, 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.029

18. TRNSYS. (s.f.). TRansient Simualtion Tool website. https://www.trnsys.com (accedido el 18 de abril de 2024)

19. Wit, S., & Augenbroe, G. (2002). Analysis of uncertainty in building design evaluations and its implications, Energy and Building 34 (9), 951-958. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788 (02)00070-1.

20. Yu, J., Chang, W.-S., & Dong, Y. (2022). Building Energy Prediction Models and Related Uncertainties: A Review. Buildings 12, 1284. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081284

21. Zhihang, Z., Jin, Z., Zhu, J., Ying, Y., Feng, X., & Hongcheng, L. (2024). Review of the building energy performance gap from simulation and building lifecycle perspectives: Magnitude, causes and solutions. Developments in the Built Environment 17, 100345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2024.100345

22. Kenzhina, M., Kalysh, I., Ukaegbu, I., & Nunna, S. K. (2019, February). Virtual power plant in Industry 4.0: The strategic planning of emerging virtual power plant in Kazakhstan. International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, ICACT, 2019, 600–605. https://doi.org/10.23919/ICACT.2019.8701989

23. Lacalle, I., Belsa, A., Vaño, R., & Palau, C. E. (2020). Framework and methodology for establishing port-city policies based on real-time composite indicators and IoT: A practical use-case. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20154131

24. Lamberti, T., Sorce, A., di Fresco, L., & Barberis, S. (2015, February). Smart port: Exploiting renewable energy and storage potential of moored boats. MTS/IEEE OCEANS 2015 - Genova. https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS-GENOVA.2015.7271376

25. Leva, S., Dolara, A., Grimaccia, F., Mussetta, M., & Ogliari, E. (2017, February). Analysis and validation of 24 hours ahead neural network forecasting of photovoltaic output power. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 131, 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATCOM.2015.05.010

Downloads

Published

2024-12-01

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 3 (2024): September - December

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Autor / BY-NC

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Anales de Edificación does not charge authors for processing or publishing an article and provides immediate Open Access to its content. All content is available free of charge to the user or his institution. Users are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search or link to the full text of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without prior permission from the publisher or author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

  1. Authors retain the copyright and grant to the journal the right to a Creative Commons attribution / Non-Commercial / Non-Derivative 4.0 International (CC BY NC ND) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship and non-commercial use.
  2. Authors may separately establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book).

Unless otherwise indicated, all contents of the electronic edition are distributed under a Creative Commons license.

 

How to Cite

Soutullo, S., Giancola, E. ., Sánchez, M. N., Porcar, B., & Jiménez, M. J. (2024). Evaluating the impact of input variables on thermal load estimation in office spaces using validated models. Anales De Edificación, 10(3), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.20868/ade.2024.5494

Most read articles by the same author(s)