Environmental impacts of different types of floor slabs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20868/ade.2025.5639Keywords:
Concrete, Structure, Life Cycle Assessment, Sustainability, Floor SlabAbstract
The implementation of a more sustainable construction sector is a reality today. To this end, understanding how concrete and steel structures and their respective structural elements, such as slabs, columns, beams, walls, etc., impact the environment is an effective strategy for generating sustainability. This research aims to determine the environmental impact of the six most common types of floor slabs in buildings. These types of floor slabs are: solid slabs, in-situ joist slabs, precast concrete joist slabs, metal joist slabs and, finally, both permanent and removable waffle slabs. To address this research, an office building has been modelled in CYPECAD, where one of the floors has been subjected to study. To determine the environmental impacts, the methodology par excellence, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), was used. The system boundaries selected for the LCA correspond to a cradle-to-gate scope for the building, and the results obtained covered eight impact categories. Among the main results per unit area (m2) of floor slab and for the Global Warming Potential impact category (kg CO2 eq), it turns out that the concrete slab type yields a value of 93,01 kg CO2 eq/m2, which represents an increase in emissions of up to 51,68% compared to the in situ concrete joist slab type (44,94 kg CO2 eq/m2) and even an increase of 53,27% compared to the metal joist slab type (43,46 kg CO2 eq). This research has yielded results that can be easily extrapolated to other buildings to determine their environmental impact.
Downloads
References
1. Colangelo, F., Forcina, A., Farina, I., & Petrillo, A. (2018). Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of different kinds of concrete containing waste for sustainable construction. Buildings, 8(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8050070.
2. CYPE Ingenieros, S. A. (2025). CYPE Ingenieros, S.A. https://info.cype.com/es/
3. Feiz, R., Ammenberg, J., Baas, L., Eklund, M., Helgstrand, A., & Marshall, R. (2015). Improving the CO2 performance of cement, part I: Utilizing life-cycle assessment and key performance indicators to assess development within the cement industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2014.01.083
4. Fraile-Garcia, E., Ferreiro-Cabello, J., Martínez De Pison, F. J., & Pernia-Espinoza, A. V. (2019). Effects of Design and Construction on the Carbon Footprint of Reinforced Concrete Columns in Residential Buildings. Materiales de Construcción, 69(335), e193–e193. https://doi.org/10.3989/MC.2019.09918
5. Fraile-García, E., Ferreiro-Cabello, J., Sodupe-Ortega, E., & Sanz-Garcia, A. (2015). Combined assessment of the environmental, economic and social impacts of structural solutions for residential construction. Informes de La Construccion, 67(539). https://doi.org/10.3989/IC.14.041
6. J.Los-Santos-Ortega, G.Anoz-Varea, J.Ferreiro-Cabello, & E.Fraile-García. (2022, September). Structural comparison between two alternatives for a hydroelectric power plant building. 19th International Multidisciplinary Modeling & Simulation Multconference.
7. Kurda, R., Silvestre, J. D., & de Brito, J. (2018). Life cycle assessment of concrete made with high volume of recycled concrete aggregates and fly ash. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 139, 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.07.004
8. Los Santos - Ortega, J., Fraile - García, E., & Ferreiro - Cabello, J. (2023). Methodology for the environmental analysis of mortar doped with crumb rubber from end-of-life tires. Construction and Building Materials, 399. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2023.132519
9. Madrid, M., Frómeta, Y. G., Cuadrado, J., & Blanco, J. M. (2022). Life cycle analysis in concrete blocks: comparison of the impact produced between traditional blocks and blocks made with by-products | Análisis de ciclo de vida en bloques de hormigón: comparación del impacto producido entre bloques tradicionales y con s. Informes de La Construccion, 74(566), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.88125
10. Mel Fraga, J., del Cacho Gochi, Alfredo., & de la Cruz López, M. P. (2014). Sostenibilidad en la preparación y puesta en obra de hormigón en España: Análisis de consumo energético y emisiones de CO2. Proceedings from the 18th International Congress on Project Management and Engineering: (Alcañiz, July 2014), 2014, ISBN 978-84-617-2742-1, Págs. 508-520, 508–520. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8225635&info=resumen&idioma=ENG
11. Ministerio de Transportes, M. y A. Urbana. G. de España. (2023). Código Estructural (Real Decreto 470/2021). https://www.mitma.gob.es/organos-colegiados/comision-permanente-de-estructuras-de-acero/cpa/codigo-estructural
12. Naciones Unidas. (2024). Objetivos y metas de desarrollo sostenible - Desarrollo Sostenible. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/es/sustainable-development-goals/
13. Santos-Ortega, J. L., Fernández-Zorzano, J., Fraile-García, E., Ferreiro-Cabello, J., & Macias, E. J. (2024). Environmental assessment of a structural element in a residential building. European Modeling and Simulation Symposium, EMSS, 2024-September. https://doi.org/10.46354/I3M.2024.EMSS.020
14. UNE-EN ISO 14040. Gestión ambiental. Análisis de Ciclo de Vida. Principios y marco de referencia. Diciembre 2006.
15. UNE-EN ISO 14044. Gestión Ambiental. Análisis de Ciclo de Vida. Requisitos y directrices. Diciembre 2006.
16. UNE-EN 15643:2021. Sostenibilidad en la construcción. Marco para la evaluación de los edificios y las obras de ingeniería civil (2021)..
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Autor / BY-NC
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Anales de Edificación does not charge authors for processing or publishing an article and provides immediate Open Access to its content. All content is available free of charge to the user or his institution. Users are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search or link to the full text of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without prior permission from the publisher or author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
- Authors retain the copyright and grant to the journal the right to a Creative Commons attribution / Non-Commercial / Non-Derivative 4.0 International (CC BY NC ND) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship and non-commercial use.
- Authors may separately establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book).
Unless otherwise indicated, all contents of the electronic edition are distributed under a Creative Commons license.
