DSF-PCM building energy performance assessment: a case study in Valencia, Spain

Authors

  • Niloufar Ziasistani Universidad de Oviedo
  • Andrés Meana-Fernández Universidad de Oviedo
  • Juan Manuel González-Caballín-Sánchez Universidad de Oviedo
  • Antonio Jose Gutierrez-Trashorras Universidad de Oviedo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20868/ade.2023.5376

Keywords:

double skin facade, phase change material, building energy performance assessment, building energy efficiency optimization, building energy savings

Abstract

Double skin facades (DSFs) and phase change materials (PCMs) are promising ways to reduce the energy demand of buildings. In this work, the effects of glazing type considering the orientation of the building on its energy performance have been studied. A four-story office building in Valencia, Spain, has been selected as the case study and has been simulated using EnergyPlus software. The materials for the building envelope for the base case study were selected considering the new Spanish code CTE-DB-HE 2019, which classifies Valencia in the B3 climate zone. The heating load was minimum when the DSF was facing south, while the minimum cooling load occurred when the DSF was facing north. Annual energy consumption reached its lowest value when the DSF was facing north. PCM was applied to different wall layers, finding that PCM located in the most inner layer performed better than in the other layers.

Downloads

References

1. Alqaed S. Effect of annual solar radiation on simple façade, double-skin facade and double-skin facade filled with phase change materials for saving energy. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 2022;51:101928.

2. Elin Markarian, Farivar Fazelpour, Multi-objective optimization of energy performance of a building considering different configurations and types of PCM. Solar Energy 191 (2019) 481–496.

3. EnergyPlus, EnergyPlus.net

4. Jankovic A, Goia F. Impact of double skin facade constructional features on heat transfer and fluid dynamic behaviour. Building and Environment. 2021;196:107796.

5. Kim D, Cox SJ, Cho H, Yoon J. Comparative investigation on building energy performance of double skin façade (DSF) with interior or exterior slat blinds. Journal of Building Engineering. 2018;20:411-23.

6. Preet S, Sharma MK, Mathur J, Chowdhury A, Mathur S. Performance evaluation of photovoltaic double-skin facade with forced ventilation in the composite climate. Journal of Building Engineering. 2020;32:101733.

7. Soto Francés VM, Serrano Lanzarote AB, Valero Escribano V, Navarro Escudero M. Improving schools performance based on SHERPA project outcomes: Valencia case (Spain). Energy and Buildings. 2020;225:110297.

8. Ziasistani N, Fazelpour F. Comparative study of DSF, PV-DSF and PV-DSF/PCM building energy performance considering multiple parameters. Solar Energy. 2019;187:115-28.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-31

How to Cite

DSF-PCM building energy performance assessment: a case study in Valencia, Spain. (2024). Anales De Edificación, 9(3), 22-27. https://doi.org/10.20868/ade.2023.5376