Midiendo la complejidad de un proyecto a través de sus redes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20868/ade.2024.5492Palabras clave:
gestion de proyectos, complejidad, adaptabilidad, redes complejas, coevoluciónResumen
Para poder establecer la complejidad de un proyecto de construcción, es necesario estudiar tanto la complejidad estructural, basada en las redes que pueden formar, como la complejidad dinámica, basada en la coevolución de los componentes de esas redes. En este trabajo, se focaliza dicho estudio sobre la red de intercambio de información entre los stakeholders o interesados en un proyecto.
Se discute en primer lugar que tipo de red se puede establecer y qué métricas se puede utilizar en ambos tipos de complejidad. En segundo lugar, se disponen las expresiones algebraicas correspondientes. Estos conceptos se aplican a un proyecto de construcción de una Estación Depuradora de Aguas Residuales (EDAR) con una combinación de obra civil e instalaciones.
Descargas
Referencias
1. Adami, V. S., & Verschoore, J. R. (2018). Implications of Network Relations for the Governance of Complex Projects. Project Management Journal, 49(2), 71-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281804900205
2. Alvarez-Espada, J. M., Fuentes-Bargues, J. L., & González-Gaya, C. (2022). Approach and success in the management of peacekeeping operations (PKOs): application to two case studies, the UNMISS and MONUSCO Missions of the UN. Sustainability, 14(10), 6097.
3. Arellano, D., Danti, J., & Pérez, M. F. (2016). Complex projects and systems. PMI Project Management Institute Madrid. https://pmi-mad.org/socios/articulos-direccion-proyectos/1225-proyectos-y-sistemas-complejos
4. Barnard, J. L. (1976). A review of biological phosphorus removal in the activated sludge process. Water sa, 2(3), 136-144.
5. Bascompte, J., & Jordano, P. (2007). Plant-animal mutualistic networks: the architecture of biodiversity. Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics, 567-593.
6. Blanchard, B. S. (1995). Systems Engineering (1.a ed.). ISDEFE.
7. Boccaletti, S., Bianconi, G., Criado, R., del Genio, C. I., Gómez-Gardeñes, J., Romance, M., Sendiña-Nadal, I., Wang, Z., & Zanin, M. (2014). The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks. Physics Reports, 544(1), 1-122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2014.07.001
8. Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92(5), 1170-1182.
9. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2018). Analyzing social networks. Sage.
10. Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. S. (2011). On network theory. Organization science, 22(5), 1168-1181.
11. Carrington, P. J., Scott, J., & Wasserman, S. (2005). Models and methods in social network analysis (Vol. 28). Cambridge university press.
12. Choi, T. Y., & Hong, Y. (2002). Unveiling the structure of supply networks: case studies in Honda, Acura, and DaimlerChrysler. Journal of Operations Management, 20(5), 469-493.
13. Dobson, I., Carreras, B. A., Lynch, V. E., & Newman, D. E. (2007). Complex systems analysis of series of blackouts: Cascading failure, critical points, and self-organization. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 53 17(2), 026103.
14. Esfahani, E. B., Zeidabadi, F. A., Bazargan, A., & McKay, G. (2018). The modified Bardenpho process. Handbook of environmental materials management, 1-50.
15. Fellman, P. V., Bar-Yam, Y., & Minai, A. A. (2014). Conflict and complexity: Countering terrorism, insurgency, ethnic and regional violence. Springer.
16. Frenken, K. (2000). A complexity approach to innovation networks. The case of the aircraft industry (1909–1997). Research Policy, 29(2), 257-272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00064-5
17. Goméz-Senent, E., Chiner, M., Capuz, S., Aragones, P., & Santamaría, J. L. (2020). Is the project a System? In Proceedings III International Congress of Project Engineering., September 1996, 131-140.
18. Hass, K., & Lindbergh, L. (2010). The bottom line on project complexity (PMI, Ed.; p. 19). Project Management Institute, Inc.
19. Iñiguez, G., & Barrio, R. A. (2009). Co-evolution in social networks. Chemical Education, 20, 272-279.
20. Kenis, P., & Oerlemans, L. (2008). The Social Network Perspective: Understanding the Structure of Cooperation. The Oxford Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations, 289-312. https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199282944.003.0011
21. Kerzner, H., & Belack, C. (2010). Managing Complex Projects. In Managing Complex Projects. John Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470927977
22. Kim, Y., Choi, T. Y., Yan, T., & Dooley, K. (2011). Structural investigation of supply networks: A social network analysis approach. Journal of operations management, 29(3), 194-211.
23. Larrea, L. (2007). Nitrogen and phosphorus removal. In CEDEX (Ed.), XXV Course on wastewater treatment and operation of treatment plants (1.a ed., Vol. 1, pp. 397-444).
24. Lassen, K. B., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2009). Complexity metrics for Workflow nets. Information and Software Technology, 51(3), 610-626. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.08.005
25. Marković, D., & Gros, C. (2014). Power laws and self-organized criticality in theory and nature. Physics Reports, 536(2), 41-74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2013.11.002
26. McCabe, T. J. (1976). A complexity measure. IEEE Transactions on software Engineering, 4, 308-320.
27. Petri, C. A. (2005). Introduction to general net theory. In Net Theory and Applications: Proceedings of the Advanced Course on General Net Theory of Processes and Systems Hamburg, October 8–19, 1979 (pp. 1–19). Springer.
28. Polančič, G., & Cegnar, B. (2017). Complexity metrics for process models – A systematic literature review. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 51, 104-117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2016.12.003
29. Poveda-Bautista, R., Diego-Mas, J.-A., & León-Medina, D. (2018). Measuring the project management complexity: the case of information technology projects. Complexity, 2018.
30. Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (1995). A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative science quarterly, 1-33.
31. Pryke, S. D. (2005). Towards a social network theory of project governance. Construction management and economics, 23(9), 927-939.
32. Rodriguez, J. C., Jordà, J. R., & Cortacans, J. A. (2000). Modelling and simulation of the phased feeding process with biological elimination of nitrogen and phosphorus; Modelling and simulation of the step-feeding process with biological removal of nitrogen and phosphorus. Water Technology, 199.
33. San Cristóbal, J. R., Carral, L., Diaz, E., Fraguela, J. A., & Iglesias, G. (2018). Complexity and project management: A general overview. Complexity, 2018.
34. Sancho Caparrini, F. (2020). Complex Systems. Scientific Network. http://www.cs.us.es/~fsancho/?p=sistemas-complejos-2
35. Stacey, R. D. (1996). Complexity and creativity in organizations. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
36. Stock, G. N., Greis, N. P., & Kasarda, J. D. (1998). Logistics, strategy and structure: a conceptual framework. International Journal of Operations & Production Management.
37. Summers, J. D., & Shah, J. J. (2010). Mechanical Engineering Design Complexity Metrics: Size, Coupling, and Solvability. Journal of Mechanical Design, 132(2). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4000759
38. Thurner, S., Hanel, R., & Klimek, P. (2018). Introduction to the theory of complex systems. Oxford University Press.
39. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications.
40. Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of 'small-world'networks. nature, 393(6684), 440-442
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Autor / BY-NC
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
1. Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución - Nocomercial 4.0 Internacional que permite a otros compartir el trabajo con un reconocimiento de la autoría y uso no comercial.
2. Los autores pueden establecer por separado acuerdos adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión de la obra publicada en la revista (por ejemplo, situarlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro).
Salvo indicación contraria, todos los contenidos de la edición electrónica se distribuyen bajo una licencia de uso y distribución “Creative Commons"
