Polyhedral communication in architecture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20868/abe.2021.1.4566Parole chiave:
Communication, Approach, Information, Design, AnalysisAbstract
There are multiple communicative strategies in architecture depending on the target audience. The mechanisms of representation may radically vary when the recipient is the client, the constructor, the curator, a colleague or even an instructor (1). As an example, the approach may be mainly visual when the target is the client. However, it may be strictly structural to start a conversation with a peer ad mostly conceptual when pointing to the jury members in a competition. In certain cases, the adaptation of the graphic language to the different scenarios leads to such a distortion on the message that the original project is hardly recognizable. To illustrate this point, the article will focus on the project of the Public Seattle Library, designed by the architect Rem Koolhaas. The analysis of five different communicative strategies of the project show peculiar and unequal graphic narrations: from the concept book of the competition, the website of LMN (the American partners of Rem Koolhaas- OMA in this particular project), the website of OMA, the coverage on the Seattle press, the Library Brochure for teenagers and the approach developed on the "Content" book. Rem Koolhaas coined the concept of "design of information" to express the fundamental relationship between the message and media in architecture. In his practice, the communicative strategy is present from the beginning of the design process till the final stages. In this article, the thoughtful comparison of these examples will enable to extract conclusions on the use of communication in architectural design and reflect on the iconic and communicative dimension of architecture in general.Downloads
Riferimenti bibliografici
G. Bateson, “Steps to an Ecology of Mind”, Jason Aronson Inc., San Francisco, 1972.
Shannon Matter, How Public Is the Seattle Public Library? Publicity, Posturing, and Politics in Public Design”. Journal of Architectural Education, Vol. 57, No. 1 (Sep., 2003): 5-18.
OMA, R. Koolhaas, “Seattle Public” in Content, Germany, Taschen, 2004, 138-149
Seattle Public Library. “Concept Book for the New Central Library”. Accessed May 1, 2016. http://www.spl.org/locations/central-library/cenbuilding-facts/cen-omalmn-conceptbook
LMN Architects. “Seattle Public Library”. Accessed May 1, 2016. http://lmnarchitects.com/project/seattlecentral-library
R. Venturi, S. Izenour, D. Scott Brown, “Aprendiendo de Las Vegas (El simbolismo olvidado de la forma arquitectónica)”. Barcelona: G. Gili, 1978.
B. Butragueño, “Rem a los dos lados del espejo”, PhD diss., Polytechnic University of Madrid, 2015
Dowloads
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
ABE (Advances in Building Education / Innovación Educativa en la Edificación) no aplica cargo alguno a los autores por procesar o publicar un artículo y provee acceso abierto (Open Access) inmediato a su contenido. Todo el contenido está disponible gratuitamente sin cargo para el usuario o su institución. Se permite a los usuarios leer, descargar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, buscar o vincular a los textos completos de los artículos, o utilizarlos para cualquier otro propósito lícito, sin pedir permiso previo del editor o el autor. Esto está de acuerdo con la definición de acceso abierto de la BOAI.
1. Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución / No Comercial / No Derivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY NC ND) que permite a otros compartir el trabajo con un reconocimiento de la autoría y uso no comercial.
2. Los autores pueden establecer por separado acuerdos adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión de la obra publicada en la revista (por ejemplo, situarlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro).
Salvo indicación contraria, todos los contenidos de la edición electrónica se distribuyen bajo una licencia de uso y distribución “Creative Commons".