Updating of contents in university teaching

Autores/as

  • Jorge Gallego-Sánchez-Torija Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
  • Jesús García-Herrero Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
  • Cesar Bedoya-Frutos Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20868/abe.2022.2.4942

Palabras clave:

Content update, Open surveys, Didactic dimensions, Didactic coordination, Educate professionals

Resumen

As a result of the integration of the university system in the European Higher Education Area in 2010, competences, methodology and evaluation have attracted the attention of researchers in the field of university teaching, while the contents have been relegated to a background. The present research aims to find out whether the contents that are taught respond to the changing demands of society or, otherwise, remain static and may become obsolete. The compulsory subject "Facilities Project" of the Degree in Fundamentals of Architecture at the Polytechnic University of Madrid is chosen as a case study. For this, an open survey is carried out to the students who take it in two successive years. As it is an open survey, students are offered a greater opportunity to express freely, both their answers and the reasons they have forgiving them. It is detected that they positively value much of the content and that they also value, to a lesser extent, other content negatively. Different evaluations are collected for each of the topics that make up the subject and also the reasons that, together with the suggestions, allow measures to be taken to improve the content offered. It is concluded that the contact with the opinion of the students allows obtaining a valuable point of view when keeping the contents updated.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

Sáez-Pérez, MP (2018). Teaching innovation and profession. Active skills and methodologies in technical areas. Advances in Building Education, 2(3), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.20868/abe.2018.3.3832

Porlan, R. _ (Cood.) (2017). University teaching. How to improve it. Madrid: Morata.

Rojo, Á., Jiménez, EG, Flores, JG, & Rodríguez, SR (2004). University teaching. Planning and development of teaching. Madrid: EOS.

Reynoso Flores, M., Alonso Gatell, A., & Pérez Ramírez, E. (2018). The environmental professional competences in the architecture student. Transformation, 14(3), 371-383.

Millán-Millan, PM (2020). On the house from home: new teaching experience in the Architecture Workshop subject. JIDA'20. VIII Conference on Educational Innovation in Architecture, Malaga, eAM'-UMA, November 12-13, 2020, pp. 37-45. DOI: 10.5821/jida.2020.9288

Fontàs-Serrat, J. & Estebanell-Minguell, M. (2020) Construction learning through the analysis of photographs of buildings. Architecture texts teaching and innovation JIDA 7, pp.83-99.

Ruesgas, LG, Gual, FV, Torrecillas, C., & Vázquez, AV (2020). Technological Proposals for self-assessment of 3D modeling exercises. Advances in Building Education, 4(2), 42-59. https://doi.org/10.20868/abe.2020.2.4463

Corcuff, P. (2008). The new sociologies. Constructions of social reality. Madrid: Alliance.

Simonton, D.K. (2003). Creative cultures, nations, and civilizations. In Paulus, PB & Nijstad, BA (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press, pp 304-325. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195147308.003.0014

Jarauta, B. & Medina, JL (2012). Teaching knowledge and university teaching. Educational Studies 22, 179-198.

Knight, P. (2005). Higher Education teachers. Training for excellence. Madrid: Narcea.

Tardif, M. (2004). Knowledge of teachers and their professional development. Madrid: Narcea.

Marugán, M., Martín, LJ, Catalina, J., & Román, JM (2013). Cognitive strategies of elaboration and nature of the contents in university students. Educational Psychology, 19(1), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.5093/ed2013a3

Coll-López, J. (2020) What should we be teaching in architecture? four c. Architecture texts teaching and innovation JIDA 7, pp.100-117.

González MV & Cabrera CI (2013) Strategic learning at the university: subject proposal for the optional/elective curriculum. Journal of Pedagogy 34(94), 261-281.

Blunt, H. L. (1998). The methodology of the survey. In Cáceres, LJ (Coord.) Research techniques in society, culture and communication. Mexico: Logman, pp. 33-73

Descargas

Publicado

2022-08-31

Número

Sección

Artículos

Cómo citar

Updating of contents in university teaching. (2022). Advances in Building Education, 6(2), 30-37. https://doi.org/10.20868/abe.2022.2.4942