Probability functions for extreme precipitation in the Guadalquivir basin

Authors

  • Raul Montes-Pajuelo Universidad de Huelva
  • Ángel-Mariano Rodríguez-Perea Universidad de Huelva
  • Julio José Caparrós-Mancera Universidad de Huelva
  • Antonio García-Chica Universidad de Jaén
  • César Antonio Rodríguez-González Universidad de Jaén

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20868/ade.2026.5708

Keywords:

Probability functions, Rainfall, Natural disaster, Guadalquivir, Hydrographic Confederation

Abstract

Hydrometeorological calculation models are required for the design of hydraulic works, both in urban areas, including sewerage works, and in civil engineering, including dams and their spillways. These models use design storms, which are developed from meteorological data on extreme precipitation, and appropriate probability distribution functions. There are different options within the distribution functions. This paper conducts a comparative analysis between the SQRT-ET max, log-Pearson III, Gumbel, and three-parameter log-normal functions. The study area is the Guadalquivir basin, where eight weather stations have been selected with data on maximum annual precipitation over 24 hours between 1973 and 2024. These are the weather stations in Seville, Córdoba, Jaén, Granada, Puebla del Maestre, Jerez de la Frontera, Beas de Segura, and Guadix.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. American Institute of Steel Construction, INC. (2022). Steel Construction Manual 16th ed. AISC, Chicago.

2. Bureau of Labor Statistic National. (2019). Census of fatal occupational injuries in 2018. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cfoi.

3. European Committee for Standardisation. (2019). EN 13374 Temporary edge protection systems - Product specification, test methods. CEN.

4. González, M. N., Cobo, A., Fuente, J. V., Bresó, S. & Lozano, C. (2011). Behaviour under static loads of temporary edge protection systems made with steel elements. Informes de la Construcción, 63(521), 57-67. [http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/ic.09.070]

5. González, M. N., Cobo, A., Lozano, C. A., & Bresó, S. (2013). Performance of temporary high-density polyethylene edge protection systems under static and impact loads. Materiales de Construcción, 63(310), 283-296. [http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/mc.2012.07111]

6. González, M. N., Cobo, A., Castaño, A., & Prieto, M. I. (2015). A comparison of the resistance of Temporary Edge Protection Systems to static and dynamic loads. Informes de la Construcción 67(538), 1-10. [http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/ic.13.161]

7. International Code Council. (2021). International Building Code. United States of America.

8. Sánchez, H. (2008). Technical Building Code: background, new developments and implications. Spanish Association for Quality. http://www.camarazaragoza.com/medioambiente/docs/bibliocamara/documentobibliocamara251.pdf.

9. Ministry of Transport, Mobility and Urban Agenda. (2022). Basic Document SUA Safety of use and accessibility. Technical Building Code. Madrid.

10. Ministry of Housing and Urban Agenda. (2009). Basic Document SE - AE Structural Safety - Actions in Buildings. Technical Building Code. Madrid.

11. Ministry of Transport and Sustainable Mobility. (2021). Structural Code. Madrid.

12. Ministry of Public Works. (2019). Basic Document SE Structural Safety, Madrid.

13. Official State Gazette. (1999). Building Regulations Act. https://www.boe.es/eli/es/l/1999/11/05/38/con

14. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2015). Fall Protection in Construction. OSHA United States Department of Labour.

15. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2016). 1926.502: Safety and Health Regulations for Construction. [Online], OSHA United States Department of Labour

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    148
  • PDF
    96
Further information

How to Cite

Montes-Pajuelo, R., Rodríguez-Perea, Á.-M., Caparrós-Mancera, J. J., García-Chica, A., & Rodríguez-González, C. A. (2026). Probability functions for extreme precipitation in the Guadalquivir basin. Anales de Edificación, 12(1), 55-61. https://doi.org/10.20868/ade.2026.5708

Most read articles by the same author(s)