Envíe este artículo por correo electrónico Requirements for a BIM execution plan (BEP): a proposal for application in Colombia = Requisitos para un plan de ejecución de BIM (BEP): propuesta de aplicación en Colombia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20868/bma.2018.2.3763
Texto completo:
PDF (English)Resumen
Abstract
The Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) Industry in Colombia is starting to implement Building Information Modeling (BIM) in their projects but in a much unorganized way. This issue could be attributed to a lack of unique and public BIM standards and guidelines for the implementation along with the inexistent support to the industry from the Government on the road to implementation. The BIM Execution Plan (BEP) is a procedural process that outlines the project’s overall vision with implementation details for the project team to follow throughout the project. In this study, the authors reviewed 20 BEPs searching for the presence of some identified and analyzed subcomponents to determine which documents were more robust. By performing a 27-question survey to understand how different BIM tools affect a BIM implementation, we investigated about the experience of some companies in the industry with five in depth interviews conducted to AEC Colombian professionals. Finally, a presentation of a BEP template that uses the analyzed documents and the identified problems in the interviews, along with an explanation of how was the use of information obtained to develop the new BEP template. Conclusions and recommendations are provided to enhance the BIM implementation in Colombia along with the template and the support files that can also help to develop and integrate future BIM process tools methodologies.
Resumen
La industria de Arquitectura, Ingeniería y Construcción (AEC) en Colombia está empezando a implementar Building Information Modeling (BIM) en sus proyectos, pero de una manera muy desorganizada. Este problema podría atribuirse a la falta de normas y pautas de carácter unificado y público para la implementación de BIM junto con el apoyo inexistente a la industria por parte del gobierno en el camino hacia dicha implementación. El Plan de ejecución BIM (BEP) es un procedimiento enmarcado en procesos BIM que describe la visión general del proyecto con detalles de implementación para que el equipo siga a lo largo del ciclo de vida del proyecto. En este estudio, los autores revisaron 20 BEPs en busca de la presencia de algunos subcomponentes identificados y analizados para determinar qué documentos eran más robustos. Al realizar una encuesta de 27 preguntas para comprender cómo diferentes herramientas BIM afectan su implementación, investigamos sobre la experiencia de algunas empresas en la industria con cinco entrevistas a profundidad realizadas a profesionales colombianos de AEC. Finalmente, hay una presentación de una plantilla de BEP que se basa en los análisis de los resultados y los problemas identificados en las entrevistas, junto con una explicación de cómo se utilizó la información obtenida para desarrollar la nueva plantilla de BEP. Se presentan conclusiones y recomendaciones para mejorar la implementación de BIM en Colombia, además de una plantilla y los archivos de soporte para que cada empresa que desee desarrollar su propio BEP pueda revisar la información presentada en este documento.
Palabras clave
Referencias
National Building Specification (NBS), “What is BIM?,” 2017. www.thenbs.com/knowledge/what-is-building-information-modelling-bim. [Accessed: 01-Jun-2017].
C. Eastman, P. Teicholz, R. Sacks, and K. Liston, BIM Handbook A guide to Building Information Modeling, Wiley. 2011.
O. Hamdi and F. Leite, “Conflicting Side of Building Information Modeling Implementation in the Construction Industry,” J. Leg. Aff. Disput. Resolut. Eng. Constr., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1–8, 2013, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000137.
A. A. Aibinu and S. Venkatesh, “Status of BIM Adoption and the BIM Experience of Cost Consultants in Australia,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 140, no. 3, pp. 1–10, 2014, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000193.
K. Ortega Burgos and C. F. Rueda Gallardo, “Evolución del impacto comercial de los proyectos de edificaciones: un indicador líder,” Bogotá D.C., 2017.
Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE), “Indicadores económicos alrededor de la construcción - IEAC,” Bogotá D.C., 2017.
J. M. Gómez-Sánchez, J. S. Rojas-Quintero, and A. A. Aibinu, “The Status of BIM Adoption and Implementation Experiences of Construction Companies in Colombia,” VII Elagec, no. November, pp. 601–611, 2016.
O. A. Olatunji, “Constructing Dispute Scenarios in Building Information Modeling,” J. Leg. Aff. Disput. Resolut. Eng. Constr., vol. 2, no. August, pp. 128–135, 2016, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.
Building and Construction Authority, “Singapore BIM Guide - V2.0,” Cornet, pp. 1–70, 2013.
H.-F. Hsieh and S. E. Shannon, “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis,” Nord. J. Digit. Lit., vol. 2015, no. 1, pp. 29–42, 2015, doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
R. Sacks, U. Gurevich, and P. Shrestha, “A review of building information modeling protocols , guides and standards for large construction clients,” J. Inf. Technol. Constr. ( ITcon ), vol. 21, no. October, pp. 479–503, 2016.
M. Fischer, H. W. Ashcraft, D. Reed, and A. Khanzode, Integrating Project Delivery. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2017, doi: 10.1002/9781119179009.
B. Gercek, O. B. Tokdemir, M. E. Ilal, and H. M. Gunaydin, “BIM Execution Process of Construction Companies for Building Projects,” Resilient Struct. Sustain. Constr., pp. 1–6, 2017, doi: 10.14455/ISEC.res.2017.5.
J. Messner et al., “BIM Project Execution Planning Guide - Version 2.1,” Build. alliance, pp. 1–135, 2011, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
Y.-C. Lin, Y.-P. Chen, W.-T. Huang, and C.-C. Hong, “Development of BIM Execution Plan for BIM Model Management during the Pre-Operation Phase: A Case Study,” Buildings, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2016, doi: 10.3390/buildings6010008.
M. Kassem, B. Succar, and N. Dawood, “Building information modeling: analyzing noteworthy publications of eight countries using a knowledge content taxonomy,” Build. Inf. Model. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., pp. 329–371, 2015, doi: 10.1061/9780784413982.
E. Alreshidi, M. Mourshed, and Y. Rezgui, “Factors for effective BIM governance,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 10, no. July 2016, pp. 89–101, 2017, doi: 10.1016/ j.jobe.2017.02.006.
M. H. Song, M. Fischer, and P. Theis, “Field Study on the Connection between BIM and Daily Work Orders,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 143, no. 5, pp. 1–4, 2015, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001267.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, “MIT BIM Execution Plan,” 2014.
Georgia Institute of Technology, “Georgia Tech BIM Requirements & Guidelines for Architects, Engineers and Contractors,” no. September, pp. 0–38, 2011.
Statsbygg, “Statsbygg BIM Manual Version 1.2.1,” Sbm, vol. 1, pp. 1–98, 2013.
Indiana University, “BIM guidelines & standards for Architects, Engineers, andContractors,” 2015.
BuildLACCD, “LACCD Building Information Modeling Standards,” p. 33, 2016.
British Standard Institution (BSI), “PAS 1192-2:2013 Specification for information management for the capital/delivery phase of construction projects using building information modelling,” 2013.
NATSPEC, “NATSPEC National BIM Guide,” no. September, p. 27, 2011.
National Institute of Building Sciences, “National BIM Guide for Owners,” 2017.
Ohio State Architect’s Office, “State of Ohio, Building Information Modeling (BIM) Protocol,” p. 25, 2010.
Hong Kong CIC, “CIC Building Information Modelling Standards,” pp. 0–103, 2014.
Finnmap Consulting Oy et al., “COBIM v 1.0,” pp. 1–22, 2012, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-12691-8.
Autodesk, “Autodesk BIM Deployment Plan: A practical framework for implementing BIM,” p. 42, 2010.
University of Florida, “BIM Project Execution Plan Template for Architects, Engineers and Contractors,” pp. 1–32, 2017.
R. Sacks and E. Pikas, “Building Information Modeling Education for Construction Engineering and Management. I: Industry Requirements, State of the Art, and Gap Analysis,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 139, no. 11, p. 4013016, 2013, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000759.
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Copyright (c) 2018 Autor / BY-NC-ND
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional.