Screencasts y las TIC para la revisión de prácticas de laboratorio en la Educación Superior = Screencasts and ICT for review of laboratory practices in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20868/ardin.2022.11.4800Keywords:
Screencast, retroalimentación, aprendizaje autónomo, ingeniería, TIC, feedback, self-learning, engineering, ICTAbstract
Resumen
El estudio presenta la experiencia docente llevada a cabo en varios grupos de laboratorio de la Asignatura de Expresión Gráfica en estudiantes de ingeniería. La investigación tiene como finalidad evaluar la percepción que tienen los alumnos al revisar las prácticas mediante videos audiovisuales en formato screencasts y la plataforma virtual Poliformat y e-mail. Los resultados de las encuestas nos ayudan a enfocar una solución tecnológica de retroalimentación virtual del profesor que, aunque es general potencia el aprendizaje autónomo y flexibiliza la gestión del tiempo del alumno. Siendo positiva la percepción de los estudiantes al empleo de herramientas tecnológicas como medio de feedback para la revisión de las prácticas.
Abstract
The paper describes a teaching experience carried out among various laboratory groups of Engineering students in the subject Graphic Expression. The aim was to evaluate the students’ perception on reviewing the lab practices by means of Screencast format videos, the Poliformat Platform and e-mail. The results of the surveys helped us to create a teacher’s virtual technological feedback solution which, although general, improved autonomous learning and gave students more flexibility in the use of their time. They also obtained a positive perception from using technological tools to obtain feedback for reviewing the practices.
Downloads
References
Ali, A. (2016). Effectiveness of Using Screencast. English Language Teaching, 9(8), 106-121. doi:https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n8p106
Amaranti, M. (2010). Concepciones y prácticas de retroalimentación de los profesores de lenguaje y comunicación de primer año de educación media: investigación cualitativa con estudio de caso. Congreso Iberoamericano de Educación (págs. 1-22). Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenos Aires,. Obtenido de https://bit.ly/2Lkgj9v
Baker, J., Capece, ,. V., & Rouch, K. (2010). Effective Use of Screencasting Software in Engineering Courses. American Society for Engineering Education, 21, 13-23.
Becerra, M., & Gonzalez, M. (2019). Utilización de screencasts para un aprendizaje activo. Contextos universitarios transformadores. III Xornadas de Innovación Docente (págs. 15-23). A Coruña: Universidade da Coruña.
Betty, P. (2008). Creation, Management, and Assessment of Library Screencasts: The Regis Libraries Animated Tutorials Project. Journal of Library Administration , 48(3), 295-315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01930820802289342
Blackman, C., & Asención-Delaney, Y. (2016). retroalimentación de la escritura de estudiantes de español con screencasts: beneficios y retos. MARCOELE. Revista de didáctica español como lengua extranjera(23), 1885-221.
Blasco, J. S., & Bernabé, G. (2015). El uso de audiovisuales como herramienta al servicio del proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje en musicoterapia. XIII Jornadas de Redes de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria (págs. 1978-1990). Alicante: Universidad de Alicante, Instituto de Ciencias de la Educación. Obtenido de http://hdl.handle.net/10045/49559
Blonder, R., Moshe, M., Bar-Dov, Z., Benny, N., Rap, S., & Sakhnini, S. (2013). Can You Tube it? Providing chemistry teachers with technological tools and enhancing their self-efficacy beliefs. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14, 269-285. doi: https://doi.org/10.1039/c3rp00001j
Carr, A., & Ly, P. (2009). More than Words’: Screencasting as a Reference Tool. Reference Services Review, 34(4), 408-420. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/00907320911007010
Cunningham, K. (2019). Student perceptions and use of technology mediated text and screencast feedback in ESL writing. Computers and Composition, 52, 222-241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.02.003
De Battisti, P., Ríos, M., & Felgueras, J. (2016). Creación de videos con la aplicación screencast-o-matic para las aulas virtuales de la plataforma moodle en la facultad de ciencias económicas de la UNPSJB. Obtenido de https://bit.ly/33QqbhK
de Grazia, J., Falconer, J., Nicodemus, J., & Medlin, J. (2012). Incorporating screencasts into chemical engineering courses. American Society for Engineering Education, 1-18.
Escudero Fernández, S. (2020). Flipped Classroom: Aplicación práctica empleando Lessons en las prácticas de laboratorio de una asignatura de Ingeniería. ArDin., 27-48. doi:10.20868/ardin.2020.9.4120
Escudero Fernández, S. (2021). Aprendizaje Clase Inversa como metodología de enseñanza-aprendizaje en grupos. En VVAA, Nuevas técnicas docentes (págs. 125-134). Madrid: Editorial Pirámide.
Falconer, J., de Grazia, J., Medlin, J., & Holmberg, M. (2009). Using Screencasts in Chemical Engineering Courses. Chem. Eng., 302.
Falconer, J., Nicodemus, G. D., de Grazia, J., & Medlin, J. (2012). Chemical engineering screencasts. Chemical Engineeríng Education, 46(1), 58-62. Obtenido de https://bit.ly/2OObZl3
García, Y. (2019). Estudio de caso del modelo clase invertida en un curso de mecánica de cuerpos rígidos. Revista Gaceta Técnica., 20(2), 51-65. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11020.87683
Ghilay, Y. (2018). Video-based learning of quantitative courses in higher education. imanager. i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 15(2), 16-27. doi:https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.15.2.14302
González-Siso, M., & Becerra Fernández, M. (2019). Utilización de screencasts para un aprendizaje. En E. De la Torre Fernández, Contextos universitarios transformadores: construíndo. 15-24. doi:https://doi.org/10.17979/spudc.9788497497121.015
Harney, S. (2017). Visual Audio Screencasts to. En Technology-Enabled Feedback Approaches for First-Year. Obtenido de https://bit.ly/2rLHbYZ
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 88(1), 81–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. New York, NY: Cambridge University. Obtenido de https://bit.ly/2LillTE
Kilickaya, F. (2016). Use of screencasting for delivering lectures and providing feedback in educational contexts: Issues and implications. En M. M. Krajka, CALL for openness (págs. 73-90). New York: Peter Lang.
Kinnari-Korpela, H. (2015). Using Short Video Lectures to Enhance Mathematics Learning – Experiences on Differential and Integral Calculus Course for Engineering Students. Informatics in Education, 2015(1), 67-81. doi: https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2015.05
Kroski, E. (2009). That's infotainment: How to create your own screencasts. School Library Journal, 55, 40-42.
Kulbavy, R. W. (1977). Feedback in written instruction. Review of Educational Research, 47(2), 211-232. doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543047002211
Lang, G. (2016). The relative efficacy of video and text tutorials in online computing education. Information Systems Education Journal, 14(5).
Lloyd, S., & Robertson, C. (2012). Screencast Tutorials Enhance Student. Technology And Teaching, 39(1), 67-71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628311430640
Loch, B., & McLoughlin, C. (2011). An instructional design model for screencasting :Engaging students in self-regulated learning. Ascilite. Changing demands, changing directions. (págs. 816-821). Australia: University of Tasmania.
Lu, Y., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Ding, A., & Glazewski, K. (2017). Experienced iPad-Using Early Childhood Teachers: Practices in the One-to-One iPad Classroom. Computers in the Schools, 34(6), 9-23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2017.1287543
Mayer, R. (2002). Multimedia Learning. Psychology of learning and motivation, 41, 85-139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-7421(02)80005-6
Mayer, R. (2005). Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. En R. E. Mayer, The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (págs. 31-48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511816819.004
McCarthy, J. (2015). Evaluating written, audio and video feedback in higher education summative assessment tasks. Issues in Educational Research, 25(2), 153-169. Obtenido de https://bit.ly/2Rf5sBt
Miller, D. B., & Zhao, A. (2017). Opening Up Higher Education with Screencasts. En R. S.-D. Jhangiani (Ed.), Open: The Philosophy and Practices that are Revolutionizing Education and Science (págs. 125–138). London:: Ubiquity Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.5334/bbc.j.
Morris, M., & Chikwa, G. (2013). Screencasts: How effective are they and how do students engage with them? Active Learning in Higher Education, 15(1), 25-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787413514654
Mullamphy, D., Higgins, P., Belward, S., & Ward, L. (2010). To screencast or not to screencast. ANZIAM J. 51 (EMAC2009), C446-C460. doi:https://doi.org/10.21914/anziamj.v51i0.2657
Nicodemus, J., Falconer, J., & Medlin, J. (2011). Incorporating Screencasts into Chemical Engineering Courses: Online Videos as Course Supplements and Student Feedback. American Society for Engineering Education.
Paivio, A. (1990). Dual Coding Theory. En A. Pavio, Mental Representations: A dual coding approach (págs. 53-83). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195066661.003.0004
Pang, K. (2009). Video-Driven Multimedia, Web-Based Training in the Corporate Sector: Pedagogical Equivalence and Component Effectiveness. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.629
Pascual, M. (2011). Principios pedagógicos en el diseño y producción de nuevos medios, recurs os y tecnologías. En VVAA, Medios, recursos didácticos y tecnología (págs. 89-101). Madrid: Pearson Educación.
Peterson, E. (2007). Incorporating screencasts in online teaching. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(3), 1-4. doi:https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v8i3.495
Pinder-Grover, T., Green, K., & Mirecki, J. (2011). The efficacy of screencasts to address the diverse academic needs of students in a large lecture course. Advances in Engineering Education, 1-28.
Pinder-Grover, T., Mirecki, J., Bierwert, C. & Shuller, L. (2009). The efficacy of screencasts on diverse students in a large lecture course. American Society for Engineering Education, 2(3), 1-18.
Plass, J. L. (1998). Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second-language mul-timedia learning environment. Journal of Edu-cational Psychology, 90(1), 25-36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.25
Robinson, M., Loch, B., & Croft, T. (2015). Student Perceptions of Screencast Feedback. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1(3), 363-385. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-015-0018-6
Ruffini, M. (31 de 10 de 2012). Screencasting to engage learning. Recuperado el 15 de 07 de 2019, de Educause review online: https://bit.ly/2sEwGah
Sabater, P., Pérez, M., Isla, P., Valls, R., López, C., Rigol, A. & Puig, M. (2012). Feedback profesor-alumno: ¿qué modalidad prefieren los estudiantes? VII Congreso Internacional de Docencia Universitaria e Innovación (págs. 1-22). Barcelona: Universidad Pompeu Fabra. Obtenido de https://bit.ly/33Nuv10
Shute, V. (2008). Focus on Formative Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
Simmonds, T., Gent, D., & Stoneham, R. (2014). Effective/Cost-effective Screencasting. Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching, 3(6). doi:https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v5i9.112
Soden, B. (2017). The Case of Screencast Feedback: Barriers to the Use of Learning Technology. Innovative Practice in Higher Education, 3(1), 1-21.
Soto, M. (2015). Elementary Students' Mathematical Explanations and Attention to Audience With Screencasts. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(4), 242-258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2015.1078190
Sugar, W., Brown, A., & Luterbach, K. (2010). Examining the anatomy of a screencast: uncovering common elements and instructional strategies. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(1), 1-20. doi:https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v11i3.851
Sutton-Brady, C., Scott, K., Taylor, L., Carabetta, G., & Clark, S. (2009). The value of using short-format podcasts to enhance learning and teaching. ALT-J, 17(3), 219-232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09687760903247609
Tabuenca, B., Kalz, M., & Löhr, A. (2018). MoocCast: evaluating mobile-screencast for online courses. Universal Access in the Information Society, 17(4), 745-753. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0528-x
Thomas, A. (2017). Screencasting to Support Effective Teaching Practices. Teaching Children Mathematics, 23(8), 492-499. doi:https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.23.8.0492
Wakeman, C. (2013). The Innovative Use of Screencasts in Higher Education. Innovative Practice in Higher Education, 1(3), 1-5. Obtenido de https://bit.ly/33IKQnF
Williams, H., Norman, N., Reilly, P., Zhou, Z., & Pe, C. (2002). Screencasts in engineering . Journal for Excellence in Teaching and Learning, 1-12.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
ArDIn does not charge authors for processing or publishing an article and provides immediate Open Access to its content. All content is available free to the user or their institution. Users are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search or link to the full text of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without prior permission from the publisher or author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
- Authors retain the copyright and grant to the journal the right to a Creative Commons attribution / Non-Commercial / Non-Derivative 4.0 International (CC BY NC ND) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship and non-commercial use.
- Authors may separately establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book).
Unless otherwise indicated, all contents of the electronic edition are distributed under a Creative Commons license.
