Enseñanza de la filosofía de Lean Construction en la formación de Ingenieros Civiles: Una actualización del diseño del curso = Teaching Lean Construction for undergraduate Civil Engineering students: An update on course design
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20868/abe.2020.3.4507
Texto completo:
PDFResumen
Este artículo tiene como objetivo resaltar la importancia de la enseñanza de la filosofía Lean Construction para complementar la formación de alumnos de pregrado de la carrera de ingeniería Civil y dar pautas para la actualización del diseño del curso sabiendo que para que sea efectivo el aprendizaje este debe estar relacionado a la solución de problemas que suceden en el día a día en los proyectos de construcción y teniendo en cuenta que los estudiantes aún no cuentan o tienen poca experiencia profesional. Por ello, el uso de herramientas donde el alumno pueda entender la problemática y poder desarrollar el pensamiento analítico y critico es indispensable. En ese sentido, una herramienta didáctica muy útil son los estudios de caso y ejemplos reales de problemas que suceden en las obras ya que lleva al alumno a entender a través de casos los problemas que suceden durante el desarrollo y ejecución de proyectos y como se pueden plantear soluciones a través de la aplicación de conceptos Lean. Es importante mencionar que la aplicación de la filosofía Lean tanto en el Perú como en el mundo está ganando terreno rápidamente por ello el introducir al alumno al entendimiento de esta filosofía le da una base para su correcta aplicación al ejercer la profesión y poder gozar de los beneficios en los proyectos que participe. Según las encuestas, la efectividad de todas las actividades fue superior al 90%, lo que demuestra el éxito de la metodología.
Abstract
This paper aims to highlight the importance of teaching Lean Construction philosophy for civil engineering undergraduate students and give guidelines for its update on course design, taking into account that for effective learning the course must include real construction projects problems solving and knowing that students have very little or no professional experience. Therefore, it is essential to use tools that help the student to understand the problem and be able to develop analytical and critical thinking. In this sense, a very useful didactic tool is the use of case studies, since it makes the student understand the problems related to construction projects and how they can propose solutions through the application of Lean concepts. It is important to mention that the application of the Lean philosophy both in Peru and in the world is rapidly gaining ground; therefore, introducing the student to this philosophy gives a basis for its correct implementation. According to the surveys, the effectiveness of all activities was higher than 90%, which demonstrates the success of the methodology.
Palabras clave
Referencias
S., Steuer, D., Krichbaum, V. & Haghsheno, S. (2019). Smart Data - Dealing With Task Complexity in Construction Scheduling. 27th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC). Dublin, Ireland, 3-5 Jul 2019. pp 347-358.
S., Koskela, L., Tzortzopoulos, P. & Haghsheno, S. (2020). Negative Effects of Design-Bid-Build Procurement on Construction Projects. 28th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC). Berkeley, California, USA, 6-10 Jul 2020. pp 733-744.
Brioso, X. (2015), El Análisis de la Construcción sin Pérdidas (Lean Construction) y su relación con el Project & Construction Management: Propuesta de Regulación enEspaña y su Inclusión en la Ley de la Ordenación de la Edificación. PhD thesis. Technical University of Madrid, Spain, 2015.
Koskela, L. (2000). An Exploration towards a Production Theory and its Application to Construction. PhD Dissertation, VTT Building Technology, Espoo, Finland.
Brioso, X. & Humero, A. (2017). Incorporating Lean Construction agent into the Building Standards Act: the Spanish case study. Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: an International Journal, 8(1), pp. 1511-1517.
Demirkesen, S. , Wachter, N. , Oprach, S. & Haghsheno, S. (2019). Identifying Barriers in Lean Implementation in the Construction Industry. 27th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC). Dublin, Ireland, 3-5 Jul 2019. pp 157-168
Brioso, X. (2015). Teaching Lean Construction: Pontifical Catholic University of Peru Training Course in Lean Project & Construction Management. Procedia Engineering, 123 (2015) 85 – 93.
Ghannoum, C., Antar, S., Daoud, Y. and Hamzeh, F. (2019). Are Construction Clients Ready to Lead the Lean Initiative? Lean Construction Journal, 2019(1), pp. 105-120.
Tsao, C. C. Y., Alves, T. d. C. L. & Mitropoulos, P. T. (2012). Different Perspectives on Teaching Lean Construciton. 20th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. San Diego, USA.
Alves, T.D.C.L., Milberg, C. & Walsh, K.D. (2010). Exploring Lean Construction Practice, Research, and Education. 18th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. Haifa, Israel.
Nofera, W., Abdelhamid, T. & Lahouti, A. (2015). Teaching Lean Construction for University Student(s), Lean Construction Journal, 2015 Issue. pp 34-44.
Tsao, C.C., Draper, J. & Howell, G.A. (2014). An Overview, Analysis, and Facilitation Tips for Simulations That Support and Simulate Pull Planning. 22nd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. Oslo, Norway.
Devkar, G., Trivedi, J. & Pandit, D. (2019). Teaching Target Value Design: A Simulation. 27th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC). Dublin, Ireland, 3-5 Jul 2019. pp 479-490.
Brioso, X., Humero, A. and Calderon-Hernandez, C. (2018). Teaching how to integrate Last Planner System and the Safety and Health Management System. ABE (Advances in Building Education / Innovación Educativa en la Edificación), 2 (1), pp. 12-30.
International Standards Office (2018). ISO 19650-1:2018. Organization and digitization of information about buildings and civil engineering works, including building information modelling (BIM) — Information management using building information modelling — Part 1: Concepts and principles. Geneva: ISO.
Sacks, R., Eastman, C., Lee, G., Teicholz, P. (2018). BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Designers, Engineers, Contractors, and Facility Managers. (2018) Wiley.
Volk, R., Stengel, J. and Schultmann, F. (2014). Building Information Modeling for Existing Buildings—Literature Review and Future Needs. Automation in Construction, 38,109-127.
Sacks, R., Koskela, L., Dave, B., and Owen, R. (2010). Interaction of Lean and Building Information Modeling in Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2010, 136(9): 968-980.
Murguia, D., Brioso, X., Ruiz-Conejo, L. and Fernandez, L. (2017). Process Integration Framework for the Design Phase of a Residential Building. Procedia Engineering, 196, pp. 462-469.
Brioso, X., Murguía, D. & Urbina, A. (2017). Comparing three scheduling methods using BIM models in the Last Planner System. Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: an International Journal, 9 (2017), Issue 1, pp. 1604–1614.
Brioso, X., Humero, A. & Calampa, S. (2016). Comparing Point-to-Point Precedence Relations and Location-Based Management System in Last Planner System: A Housing Project of Highly Repetitive Processes Case Study. Procedia Engineering, 164 (2016), pp. 12–19.
Guzman, A (2014). Aplicación de la filosofía Lean Construction en la Planificación, Programación, Ejecución y Control de Proyectos. Tesis de Ingeniería Civil. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
Seppänen, O., Ballard, G., & Pesonen, S. (2010). The combination of last planner system and location-based management system. Lean Construction Journal, 2010 Issue, pp. 43-54.
Seppänen, O., Evinger, J., & Mouflard, C. (2013). Comparison of LBMS schedule forecasts to actual progress. 21st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction 2013 Fortaleza, Brazil, pp. 506-515.
Brioso, X., Murguia, D. y Urbina, A. (2017). Teaching Takt-Time, Flowline, and Point-to-Point Precedence Relations: A Peruvian Case Study. Procedia Engineering, 196, pp. 666-673.
Frandson, A. G., Seppänen, O. & Tommelein, I. D. (2015). Comparison Between Location Based Management and Takt Time Planning. 23rd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. Perth, Australia, 29-31 Jul 2015. pp 3-12.
Ballard, G. (2000). The Last Planner System of Production Control, Ph.D. Disser-tation, School of Civil Engineering., Univertity of Birmingham, U.K., May, 192 pp.
Ballard, G. and Howell, G. (2003). An update on Last Planner. 11th Annu. Conf. Int. Gr. Lean Constr., pp. 1–10, 2003.
Ballard, G. and Tommelein, I. (2016). Current Process Benchmarket for the Last Planner System. Lean Construction Journal, 2016(1), pp. 57–89.
Tvedt, I. M. (2020). Divergent Beliefs About Productivity Despite Concurrent Engineering and Pull Planning, a Case Study. 28th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC). Berkeley, California, USA, 6-10 Jul 2020. pp 301-312.
Ramalingam, S. (2018), Mapping of BIM Process for Teaching Lean. 26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. Chennai, India, 18-20 Jul 2018. pp 1291-1301.
Murguia, D. and Brioso, X. (2017). Using Choosing by Advantages and 4D Models to Select the Best Construction-Flow Option in a Residential Building. Procedia Engineering, 196, pp. 470-477.
Brioso, X. (2015). Integrating ISO 21500 Guidance on Project Management, Lean Construction, and PMBOK. Procedia Engineering, 123 (2015), pp. 76 – 84.
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Copyright (c) 2021 Autor / BY-NC-ND
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional.